Dumping RSS for Twitter is a Mistake

with 4 comments

I disagree with Steve Gillmor’s recent essay, Rest in Peace, RSS, that declares RSS is dead.  There, I said it.

Now, it’s scary to say that because Steve Gillmor is a legendary tech journalist whom I respect tremendously.  For me to even assume that I know 1/10th of what Steve Gillmore knows in his pinky finger is audacious.  Nonetheless, I think he misses the mark.

To summarize, Steve says that he’s completely abandoned his RSS Reader (Google Reader) and now gets his information entirely from Twitter.  In short, this is the money line:

Twitter, not RSS, became the early warning system for new content.

Well, yes, that is correct: Twitter is currently the best early warning system for new content.  Once upon a time, RSS played that role, but Twitter is faster at getting it out there now.

However, in my view, to say that RSS is dead is misunderstanding the inherent value of RSS.  First, with RSS I don’t miss anything because it’s all there in my reader.  With Twitter, if a tweet with a link to a blog post flows by while I’m out of town, then I’ve missed it.  Second, Twitter doesn’t push actual content, it pushes headlines and sound-bites.

In my mind, here’s the analogy: Twitter is to RSS as the newspaper is to news magazines.  In other words, Twitter is to RSS as The New York Times is to The New Yorker.[1] I subscribe to both (seriously), but value them for different reasons.  I will miss a story or two (or two hundred!) unless I read the NYT religiously every day, and the stories will become dated.  On the other hand, I pretty much catch every story in The New Yorker and they are far less perishable.

All that being said, Steve is right that RSS is no longer the early warning system for new content.  However, that doesn’t mean you should abandon RSS–not all content is about immediacy.

RSS and Twitter are just tools for consuming information, and what’s important is to use those tools appropriately.  In fact, I think you will be making a mistake if you do abandon RSS because there is plenty of great information that is just as valuable tomorrow as it was today.

You should sign up for my RSS feed which you can do by clicking here.  Subscribing to my RSS feed will save you time by pushing my blog directly to you, and ensure that you don’t miss anything important.

[1] – Perhaps a more apt analogy would be that Twitter is to RSS as network TV evening news is to The New Yorker

Written by scottporad

July 21st, 2009 at 12:00 am

4 Responses to 'Dumping RSS for Twitter is a Mistake'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Dumping RSS for Twitter is a Mistake'.

  1. I don’t think RSS is dead or should be dead, but I can’t remember the last time I checked Google Reader. Most blogs I used to consume via RSS now tweet about every post anyway so I get it that way.

    Of course, having a good filtering mechanism for Twitter is critical for this.

    markpuck

    21 Jul 09 at 11:00 am

  2. Personally, Twitter and RSS serve quite different functions in how I attain information. Twitter allows me to view what others find intriguing while RSS lets me keep track of what I find intriguing.

    Sean

    21 Jul 09 at 11:04 am

  3. [...] I Feed Google Reader Shared Items into Twitter and FriendFeed Jump to Comments Unlike others out there in the Interwebs, I still use Google Reader.  Like all Google Reader users, I have a Shared Items [...]

  4. I LOVE twitter tools! There are some many great ones out there now, it really makes twitter much more fun.

    twitter

    4 Nov 09 at 10:41 am

Leave a Reply